Monday, April 16, 2012

A song about trees because it's better than a song about people

13 comments:

ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...

The Sequoia don't care about the maples, or the oaks neither.
~

Randal Graves said...

But at least none of them yap (or don't).

ifthethunderdontgetya™³²®© said...

They do get sappy, though.
~

Demeur said...

Hope that singer didn't suffer too much when the tree fell on him.

Prunella Vulgaris said...

Screaming Trees!

Randal Graves said...

if, must you maple my leg?

demeur, Folger's instant coffin.

duchess, if a tree screams in a forest and no one is around to hear it, does it make an album?

Prunella Vulgaris said...

I'm sure if it does, it's very entlike, or gnarly, or folky.

Tom Harper said...

Ah yes, the old "trees or people" dilemma.

Beach Bum said...

Yeah, I have several screws rattling around inside my head but I swear the vocalist sounded like Cookie Monster screaming "brains."

susan said...

I appreciate your sentiment but I had to turn the volume down when the neighbors banged on the wall. Back in the day manly men of manliness took pride in chopping them down. Playing music for them is better.

S.W. Anderson said...

Trees are nice at a distance. Close to home, they create a lot of work, sometimes expense and even danger.

Randal Graves said...

duchess, we need to hire some ents to demolish the monstrosity being erected behind the Towering Slab.

tom, who said anything about a dilemma?

BB, cookies, like trees, are also good.

susan, so telling them that it was Halifax Arbor Day didn't work?

SWA, that's what you get for not taking the time to master the wizardly art of weather control.

Life As I Know It Now said...

Long live the Redwoods! Long live the trees! Admit it Randal--your a hippie at heart :)